Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors: Current State of Impact Investing
In collaboration with CIID’s portion of Abundance Circle’s first phase of work, Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisor’s (RPA) impact investing team has completed a review of the efficacy of impact investing to date, its relationship to grantmaking, and innovative models that may lead to prototypes in Phase 2. The activities of this body of work include interviews of 20 leading foundations, 10 years of private foundation tax return data and insider practitioner knowledge.
As for market trends, interest and activity for impact investing have surged during the last ten years. Using one of the broadest definitions of impact investing as defined by the US SIF, sustainable and responsible investing from U.S.-based asset owners has grown more than 300% since 2012 to a current market size of $17.1 trillion or 30% of total assets under professional management.
Based on interviews of leading foundations using the tools of impact investing, these tools are largely seen as successful. Based on data from US foundation tax returns, the 990FP, from 2010 to 2020, only 20% of 571 foundations (over $20M in assets) are using Program Related Investments to reach their 5% require payout. The remaining 80% are using PRIs over and above the required payout, indicating that grant dollars have been reduced by PRIs in only 1/5 of foundations. Instead, PRIs – if used thoughtfully – are seen as adding an important tool to a foundation’s toolkit to achieve impact and recycle resources.
Finally, as the project moves into Phase 2, we build upon the most compelling financial vehicle innovation of the last few decades. From the time-tested Community Development Financial Institution (CDFI) to more recent revenue-based financing, we have compiled a full list of structures that inherently integrate financial and impact priorities.

Field Maturity: Abundance of Products
The success of impact investing has led to the development of product at the intersection of each asset class and impact theme

PRI Data Analysis
The best data-driven measure of the effect of impact investing on grantmaking is through Program Related Investments – impact investments allowed to count towards a private foundation’s 5% required payout. Our core findings:
80%
$20M+ Fdns Don’t Count PRIs towards 5% Payout
21%
of Payouts are PRIs for $20M+ Fdns
154
$1B+ Fdns use PRIs
Of all $20M+ foundations, 4 out of 5 foundations do not count PRIs towards their payout – indicating that grant budgets remain unaffected. Of those making PRIs, only 20% of total payouts PRIs.
Non-PRI Makers
As for $1B+ private foundations NOT making PRIs, the findings are as follows:
77
$1B+ Fdns Make No PRIs
1/3
$1B+ Funds Make No PRIs
6+
$1B+ Funds Make MRIs, Not PRIs
Of all $20M+ foundations, 4 out of 5 foundations do not count PRIs towards their payout – indicating that grant budgets remain unaffected. Of those making PRIs, only 20% of total payouts PRIs.
